|
|
Post by HamiltonLJ on Oct 11, 2010 18:29:24 GMT -5
The Pic at 7 is still a go?
|
|
|
|
Post by njjeepthing on Oct 11, 2010 18:50:16 GMT -5
The Pic at 7 is still a go? Awaiting an answer as well. I am good for Wed night. |
|
|
|
Post by B!lly Jones on Oct 12, 2010 16:10:10 GMT -5
I'll be there. wednesday the 13th .....right?
|
|
|
|
Post by HamiltonLJ on Oct 12, 2010 16:10:53 GMT -5
Yes the 13th!! I'll be there with my environmental officer and I talked to Mudboy today he's in!
|
|
|
|
Post by B!lly Jones on Oct 12, 2010 16:17:15 GMT -5
OK sounds good. see ya's tomorrow
|
|
|
|
Post by njjeepthing on Oct 12, 2010 20:35:12 GMT -5
Is Russ coming?
|
|
|
|
Post by mudboy on Oct 13, 2010 6:35:59 GMT -5
As far as I know he is. I'll call him around 9ish I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by mudboy on Oct 13, 2010 13:47:27 GMT -5
Just spokwe with him, hes still coming.
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Oct 14, 2010 15:35:49 GMT -5
From my perspective, aside from me eating too many wings, that meeting went very well. Here's what I take away from it:
Everybody seems to agree that this new org can help the present situation.
It seems best to get the org started with a quick and simple set of bylaws, and without incorporation.
Members will be individuals, rather than organizations. (Though, as I reflect on this, I suppose there would be no harm in allowing both individual and organization members. The only stipulation I would suggest is that anyone involved in volunteer projects needs to be registered as an individual.)
We will meet on a monthly basis, and make changes as needed.
Governing body will be a committee. Each committee member will represent one or more of the recreational groups. The more diverse the better.
All committee members will be on an equal footing with each other. In the event that we cannot reach consensus on some matter requiring a decision, the decision will be made by a simple majority vote.
I agree to be the liaison between the org and the WSF superintendent.
Please add to this any corrections other comments.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeepinjp on Oct 14, 2010 16:46:25 GMT -5
May I suggest an invitation be extended to all stakeholder organizations, and that a record of response be recorded in minutes. This way it is noted who was willing to work at a solution and who is not.
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Oct 15, 2010 6:36:49 GMT -5
Sorry I didn't notice that mudboy had started a thread specific to the meeting. Maybe the administrators can combine these, somehow?
In reply to the comment above, I would recommend that we keep extending informal invitations to other organization reps during this early stage. Then once we have actually established the organization, with bylaws and all, we may want to send formal invitations if any groups seem to be playing hard to get.
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Oct 16, 2010 6:26:36 GMT -5
Any news about the November meeting?
|
|
|
|
Post by mudboy on Oct 18, 2010 6:59:23 GMT -5
Well , I know Red Lion was mentioned. I believe a steady date should be picked out. Such as the third thursday of every month or something. Just that way it is known. Anyone got an suggestions. I just need to know so it's easier for me to get a sitter. That was our first time trying to bring all 3 kids to a meeting. It wasn't bad before the twins but now it's a little much.,
|
|
|
|
Post by njjeepthing on Oct 18, 2010 20:20:16 GMT -5
Any news about the November meeting? Say the word and I'll get permission from Lucas, Mudboy can pick up wings from the PIC on his way up ;D |
|
|
|
Post by russ on Oct 19, 2010 6:11:09 GMT -5
"I believe a steady date should be picked out. Such as the third thursday of every month or something."
I agree. I have Tuesdays and Thursdays tied up, though it would not be impossible to make a meeting on one of those nights once a month. Any other night should be do-able.
Is somebody still trying to set it up at Red Lion Inn? If that's not working out, let's just go for Lucas.
How about every third Wednesday?
|
|
